Analyzing MATIC’s Future: Is Polygon a Slumbering Behemoth or a Faltering Vessel?
Is the current downward trend for MATIC a precursor to a bullish rally, or does it indicate ongoing challenges? What are the predictions of experts regarding its future trajectory?
Table of Contents
How is Polygon (MATIC) performing?
How can Polygon enhance its position in the market?
Mixed sentiments on Polygon: Reddit community weighs in
What do experts say?
Polygon (
MATIC
) entered the cryptocurrency market with ambitious goals, aiming to address the scalability issues of Ethereum (
ETH
) by offering faster and more affordable transactions through its layer-2 solution. However, despite its lofty objectives, MATIC has experienced significant price drops from its all-time highs.
MATIC reached its peak at $2.92 in December 2021, but as of May 29, it is trading at $0.71, reflecting a decline of nearly 76%. This drop stands out considering the recent bullish trends in the broader crypto market, where many leading cryptocurrencies have recorded substantial gains.
Meanwhile, Polygon has recently undergone the Napoli upgrade, which aimed to enhance its scalability and performance. However, this upgrade has not translated into positive price action for MATIC, as it continues to face bearish trends and large-scale sell-offs by investors.
In this article, we will explore the factors contributing to MATIC’s underperformance, examining whether it is facing challenges or simply going through a phase of consolidation before a potential rebound.
How is Polygon (MATIC) performing?
Let’s delve into the performance of Polygon (MATIC) and compare it to its competitors, Arbitrum (
ARB
) and Base. We will assess total value locked (
TVL
), user activity, transaction volumes, and decentralized applications (
dApps
) volume.
TVL
TVL refers to the total amount of money locked in a blockchain’s smart contracts. It represents the total value of assets entrusted to the blockchain. A higher TVL typically indicates greater trust and usage.
According to DeFi LIama, as of May 29, Polygon has a TVL of $971.38 million, ranking it 11th among all blockchains. While this figure sounds impressive, let’s compare it to its competitors.
Arbitrum leads with a TVL of $3.12 billion, ranking 5th, followed by Base with a TVL of $1.741 billion, ranking 7th. Polygon lags behind these two significantly. Moreover, while Arbitrum and Base have witnessed an increase in TVL, Polygon’s TVL has been on a declining trend.
Now, let’s compare the market cap to TVL ratio of Polygon and Arbitrum. This ratio helps us understand how the market values the blockchain relative to its TVL.
Polygon’s ratio is 6.93, indicating that its market cap is nearly seven times its TVL. In contrast, Arbitrum’s ratio is 1.02, suggesting a more balanced valuation.
A high ratio for Polygon implies that the market is optimistic about its future potential, but the actual value locked in the network is relatively low compared to its market cap. This discrepancy may indicate that investor confidence is based more on speculative future growth rather than current utility and adoption within the network.
You might also like:
Blockchain gains intelligence: EU’s magical tech revolution
User activity and transactions
User activity
User activity is measured by the number of unique active wallets (UAW). According to Dapp Radar, as of May 29, Polygon has 6.76 million UAW, ranking it 3rd in this category. Polygon’s UAW surpasses Arbitrum’s 5.78 million and Base’s 2.74 million.
A large number of active users generally indicates a healthy and engaged community, which is vital for the long-term success of any blockchain.
Transaction volumes
As of May 29, Polygon has processed 55.75 million transactions in the last 30 days, which is an impressive figure. In comparison, Arbitrum has processed 23.98 million transactions, and Base has processed 19.47 million transactions during the same period. However, let’s dig deeper.
DApps volume
DApps are similar to apps on your phone but run on a blockchain. They drive user engagement and transaction volumes, making them crucial for any blockchain ecosystem.
In the last 30 days, as of May 29, Polygon’s dApps volume amounted to $7.91 billion, which seems significant. However, when compared to Arbitrum’s $30.42 billion and Base’s $8.64 billion, Polygon’s volume appears modest.
Moreover, despite having fewer transactions, Arbitrum’s dApps volume is significantly higher, and Base’s dApps volume is somewhat higher than Polygon’s.
The above data suggests that transactions on Arbitrum might involve larger amounts or more valuable activities, while Polygon, despite its higher transaction count, may be dealing with smaller-scale transactions.
How can Polygon improve its market standing?
To enhance its position in the market, Polygon can focus on the following areas:
1. Faster transactions and lower fees:
Polygon needs to expedite transactions and reduce fees to attract more users. For instance, in the last 30 days, Arbitrum recorded a maximum of 532 transactions per second (TPS), significantly higher than Polygon’s 282. Additionally, the average fee on Polygon is around $0.01 per transaction, which is higher than Arbitrum’s $0.001. Lowering these fees and speeding up transactions can make Polygon more appealing.
2. Improved staking incentives:
Offering higher rewards or unique benefits for staking can incentivize users to lock their assets. Ethereum 2.0 has successfully utilized this strategy, attracting substantial capital. Platforms like Lido (LIDO), which facilitate ETH staking, have witnessed remarkable growth due to attractive liquid staking rewards.
3. High-demand dApps:
Developing popular dApps can drive more value into the ecosystem. DeFi applications such as decentralized exchanges (DEXs) and lending platforms can attract significant amounts of locked assets. Uniswap (UNI) on Ethereum serves as a prime example, boosting TVL through high transaction volumes and liquidity pools.
4. Enhanced DeFi offerings:
Providing competitive DeFi services like lending, borrowing, and yield farming can attract users seeking high returns. Aave (AAVE) is an excellent example of a platform that has attracted billions in TVL through its attractive DeFi services.
5. Successful upgrades:
Launching upgrades similar to the Napoli upgrade can enhance performance and scalability, making the platform more attractive for users to lock their assets.
Mixed sentiments on Polygon: Reddit community weighs in
The sentiment on Reddit regarding Polygon is mixed, reflecting a range of opinions from optimism about its long-term potential to concerns about its recent performance and market position.
Many users remain confident in Polygon’s future despite its recent price decline. They perceive MATIC as a “sleeping giant” with significant growth potential. Some users hold substantial amounts of MATIC, acquired at different price points, and have staked their tokens to earn passive income. Staking MATIC on-chain can yield returns of around 3%, which some users view as a good way to accumulate more tokens over time.
However, there are concerns about Polygon’s recent performance. Some users note that MATIC has dropped while other crypto assets have risen, leading to frustration and skepticism. According to these users, this decline is a result of large whale investors periodically selling their holdings, creating selling pressure and impacting the token’s price.
Meanwhile, comparisons with other blockchains like Solana (SOL) highlight new challenges for Polygon. While Solana has experienced increased usage due to specific applications like meme coin transactions, MATIC, as the fee token for Polygon, has not found a similar retail-driven use case.
Some users also point out that MATIC’s price action follows its market cycle. They recall that MATIC reached its bottom earlier than most other tokens during the bear market, suggesting that its current performance might be just a phase.
Others believe that market attention often shifts to newer projects, leaving older ones to continuously innovate or risk becoming irrelevant.
Overall, most users maintain optimism, perceiving the current market as a precursor to an “alts season,” where alternative cryptocurrencies like MATIC could witness gains. They believe that once the broader crypto market moves beyond Bitcoin (BTC) and meme coins, attention and investment might shift back to projects with strong fundamentals like Polygon.
What do experts say?
Expert opinions on Polygon vary, mirroring the diverse sentiments expressed by the public. Let’s delve into what some seasoned analysts have to say about MATIC’s current and future prospects.
In a recent analysis on TradingView, a renowned crypto analyst named Bixley shared a bullish outlook for Polygon. Bixley highlighted that MATIC’s price is currently hovering near a crucial trend line just above $0.7. Breaking this trend line is essential for a breakout to occur.
While a failure to break this trend line could lead to a bearish downturn, Bixley remains optimistic, predicting that MATIC will break through, resulting in upward price movement.
Bixley’s analysis outlines several target levels. The first target is $1.2, representing a 70% increase from the current price. Further targets include $5.4, indicating a remarkable rise of 650%.
However, not all experts share Bixley’s optimism. Another analyst pointed out a concerning pattern: a death cross on MATIC’s weekly chart. A death cross, where a short-term moving average crosses below a long-term one, often signals bearish trends. This analyst predicts a potential 70% drop, which would push MATIC’s price below $0.2.
To add another perspective, Twitter users have shared their viewpoints on MATIC. One tweet defended Polygon’s position despite its recent lack of gains, emphasizing its long-term potential. Another tweet raised the possibility that certain altcoins might be phasing out. Historically, every market cycle witnesses the dramatic rise of some coins followed by their subsequent fade into irrelevance, never reaching new all-time highs again.
As always, in the crypto world, it is crucial to weigh these diverse perspectives and make informed decisions based on the most comprehensive data available. Remember to never invest more than you can afford to lose.
You might also like:
Decentralization is coming for your high-end rig | Opinion
